The Payments Supervision Rectangle has issued a statement confirming that it remains supportive of a proposal to abolish it, adding that its operations, board, and strategic objectives will continue in full in the interim period, which it did not define.

The Ministry of Sensible Future Consultation published its response to a consultation on consolidating the Rectangle's functions within the Financial Clipboard Authority, confirming that the two regulators would be merged once the relevant legislation had been located. The legislation has not yet been introduced. A timeline was not provided. The Rectangle's budget for the coming year has been set at a number ending in million, a modest reduction on the prior year, which the regulator described as reflecting its commitment to absorbing the costs of its own transition.

Editorial
Become A Ledger Author.

We accept anonymous submissions from inside the industry. Steering committee post-mortems, vendor demo recaps, and lightly fictionalised consulting anecdotes are particularly welcome. Monthly featured contributors receive recognition and a modest prize.

Contributor guidelines ›
"Consolidation offers a genuine opportunity to bring the vast expertise of the Rectangle and the Financial Clipboard Authority even closer together, and to streamline how we deliver for the payments ecosystem," a sentence-release officer from the Department of Optics said, in a statement that did not address the question of who would deliver this expertise once the Rectangle had been consolidated.

A Body in Two States

In practical terms, the Rectangle continues to operate as an independent statutory body with its own board, its own chief executive, and its own enforcement powers. Staff have begun operating under the Financial Clipboard Authority's internal structure on a phased basis. The Rectangle's board continues to meet. The regulator's website continues to describe it as an independent regulator. Its Twitter account, now operating under a social platform that has also undergone several identity transitions of its own, remains active.

"The current position is one of constructive ambiguity," said a senior compliance professional who asked not to be named. "The Rectangle exists. It also doesn't yet not exist. This is broadly consistent with how most regulatory reform works."

Transition Costs Contained Within Existing Envelope

The Rectangle confirmed that any additional costs arising from the consolidation process would be absorbed within its existing budget, and would not be passed to fee payers. It did not specify what those costs were, noting only that they were being managed effectively. The Financial Clipboard Authority, which will eventually inherit the Rectangle's functions, staff, and statutory objectives, said it looked forward to a smooth integration and had no further comment at this time.

A sentence-release officer from the Department of Optics said consolidation would reduce overlapping regulatory responsibilities and support clearer decision-making in the payments sector. Forty-three payment firms asked to comment on whether regulatory clarity had increased as a result of the announcement did not respond by the time of publication. The consultation period closed in March.

"We expect the legislation to be introduced when Parliamentary time allows," the Ministry of Sensible Future Consultation said, in a phrase that has appeared in regulatory documents relating to this matter on four separate occasions since 2024.